Doing Business Right – Monthly Report – October 2017. By Catherine Dunmore

Editor's note: This report compiles all relevant news, events and materials on transnational business regulation based on the daily coverage provided on our twitter feed @DoinBizRight. You are invited to complete this survey via the comments section below, feel free to add links to important cases, documents and articles we might have overlooked.


The Headlines

United Nations Treaty Negotiations: Debating a Treaty on business and human rights

The Third Session of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Respect to Human Rights ran from 23-27 October 2017 at the United Nations in Geneva. The session saw substantive discussions between State delegates and civil society on the elements of a future Treaty on business and human rights. Topics of debate included extraterritoriality, provisions on the supremacy of human rights over trade and investment agreements, the Treaty’s scope in terms of companies covered, international cooperation, monitoring and implementation mechanisms. The process is set to continue in 2018, with the Chair expected to present a proposal for a draft Treaty ahead of the IV session. Meanwhile, over forty civil society organisations addressed an open letter to States and the EU calling on decision-makers to ensure the continuity of the process. The organisations call on governments and the European Union to explicitly commit to “prepare detailed reactions to the elements for a draft legally binding instrument, in preparation for constructive engagement in the ongoing process towards a draft text and the next negotiation session of the OEIGWG”.

Lungowe v Vedanta: Court of Appeal confirms jurisdiction against English domiciled parent company

On 13 October 2017, the Court of Appeal in London handed down its judgment in Dominic Liswaniso Lungowe and Ors. v Vedanta Resources Plc and Konkola Copper Mines Plc [2017] EWCA Civ 1528. The case is brought by 1,826 villagers from the Chingola region of Zambia against the London Stock Exchange listed metals and mining company Vedanta Resources Plc and its Zambian subsidiary Konkola Copper Mines Plc. The villagers claim personal injury, damage to property and loss of income, amenity and enjoyment of land, due to alleged pollution and environmental damage caused by discharges from the Nchanga copper mine for over a decade. The judgment runs contrary to the historical legal doctrine that English domiciled parent companies are protected from liability for their foreign subsidiaries’ actions. The decision clarifies the duty of care standard a parent company owes when operating via a subsidiary and opens the gates to other English domiciled companies and their subsidiaries potentially being held accountable for any human rights abuses.

Bangladesh Accord Arbitrations: Decision on Admissibility of Claims and Confidentiality

On 16 October 2017, the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued a press release on behalf of the Tribunal in two arbitrations. The arbitrations arose under the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh signed on 15 May 2013. The Accord is an agreement between global brands and trade unions created in the aftermath of the Rana Plaza building collapse, to establish a fire and building safety programme for workers in the textile industry in Bangladesh. In 2016, IndustriALL Global Union and UNI Global Union commenced arbitrations under the Accord and the UNCITRAL Rules of Arbitration 2010 against two global fashion brands. The Tribunal, composed of Professor Hans Petter Graver, Mr Graham Dunning QC and Mr Donald Francis Donovan (presiding), was formally constituted on 3 February 2017. On 4 September 2017, the Tribunal issued a second Procedural Order, finding the claims to be admissible under Article 5 of the Accord and issuing directions on confidentiality and transparency. In its deliberations, the Tribunal accounted for the interest in the Accord from the public, numerous signatories and other stakeholders, but also the need to protect the business information and reputational interests of the brand companies. The arbitrations will now proceed to a merits phase, with hearings scheduled for the first half of 2018.


Company Reports and Press Releases 

Government Reports and Guidance

NGO Reports, Papers and Investigations

In court

In the news

Environment

Labour

Mining and Minerals

Modern Slavery

Sport

Swiss Responsible Business Initiative

Terrorism

United Nations

Speeches, Videos and Interviews


Academic Materials

Blogs

Asser Institute Doing Business Right Blog

Others

Upcoming Events

Asser Institute

Others

Comments are closed
Doing Business Right Blog | Doing Business Right – Monthly Report – February 2018 - By Shamistha Selvaratnam

Doing Business Right – Monthly Report – February 2018 - By Shamistha Selvaratnam

Editor’s note: Shamistha Selvaratnam is a LLM Candidate of the Advanced Masters of European and International Human Rights Law at Leiden University in the Netherlands. Prior to commencing the LLM, she worked as a business and human rights solicitor in Australia where she specialised in promoting business respect for human rights through engagement with policy, law and practice.

 

Introduction

This report compiles all relevant news, events and materials on Doing Business Right based on the coverage provided on our twitter feed @DoinBizRight and on various websites. You are invited to contribute to this compilation via the comments section below, feel free to add links to important cases, documents and articles we may have overlooked.

 

The Headlines

German Development Ministry drafts mandatory human rights due diligence

It was reported on 10 February 2019 that the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development has drafted legislation (unpublished) on mandatory human rights due diligence for German companies. It is reported that the law will apply to companies with over 250 employees and more than €40 million in annual sales. The draft legislation targets, inter alia, the agriculture, energy, mining, textile, leather and electronics production sectors. Companies that fall within the scope of the legislation will be required to undertake internal risk assessments to identify where human rights risks lie in their supply chains. Companies would also be required to have a Compliance Officer to ensure compliance with due diligence requirements. The Labor Inspectorate, the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the Human Rights Commissioner of the Federal Government would be responsible for enforcing the legislation, with penalties for non-compliance of up to €5 million (as well as imprisonment and exclusion from public procurement in Germany).

Kiobel case heard in the Netherlands

On 12 February 2019, the Dutch courts heard a lawsuit involving Esther Kiobel and three other women against Shell. The plaintiffs allege that Shell was complicity in the 1995 killings of their husbands by Nigeria’s military. The husbands were Ogoni activists that were part of the mass protests against oil pollution in Nigeria’s Ogoniland. The judgment is expected to be handed down in May 2019. Read more here.


UN and International Organisations publications and statements

NGO, Human Rights Organisations and Law Firm publications and statements

Government press releases and publications

In Court

In the News

Academic Materials

Blogs           

Asser Institute Doing Business Right Blog

Others

Videos

Call for Papers, Submissions and Abstracts

Upcoming Events

Comments are closed